This looks good, what's really exciting to me about this game, is that they will be using the same tech as in that indiana jones game, now I just have to wait and see how it all turns out.
I bet something happens, and it gets delayed until fall.
Well, as far as I'm concrened, this is a BIG remake, if you've seen the graphics, you'll know what I am talking about. Even if you have played the original xbx version, you should still try it out on the ps3, if you have one.
I agree with most of what he says except of his defense of the ps3's launch, he says it was greatly succesful because they were able to get so many units out to the market. However, the only reason that was the case was because of the obvious lack of any real sales. I feel that perhaps they are avoiding the fact that their console is not currently in great enough demand. They should stop being cowardly, and come out and say what is obviously right there, THEY CAN'T SELL. Now, I'm not anti-son...
will it break the history of bad videogame movies? Suuuuuure, as soon as Sony learns not to lie like it depends on their life. . . . (like that will ever happen.)
I shouldn't be so cynical I guess, but I REALLY doubt as to whether they can pull this off.
we all know this already, why are people still doing all these predictions, OBVIOUSLY they can't have as much of an impact with the competition that they have now, when ps2 came out it had no competition for a year, and on top of that sony already had a huge amount of people on their side, now that isn't the case, because 360 got a year's head start. Does this mean ps3 will fail? No one knows for sure, but to predict it is going to fail, as some people are saying is just not very smart. Reall...
well, this doesn't really say much of anything that isn't already quite obvious, unless you've been under a rock for the last 9 or 10 years, or are over the age of 70. Everyone knows this already. Who knows, sooner or later the videogame industry may be entirely in the lead.
are people still bickering about that CGI demonstration? So what, they didn't show actual gameplay, that was 2 YEARS ago, just get over it.
I completely agree with this article, the ps3 is a great multimedia piece of work. But they really need to work on actually getting the games out, most people that want the ps3 likely want it for games, meaning that's what's most important here. I hope sony realizes that.
it looks like it might be pretty good, really hard to tell at this point, however I still feel that Naughty Dog should have stuck with the Jak series
that they had to port this to ps3, we really don't need any more bad games cluttering the poor system up. I honestly don't know why sega even tries doing sonic games anymore, they have been failures for the past several years, I'm not even sure of sonic's wii-debute, it will probably suck too
I knew it, figures, they probably weren't able to get the game to look as good as they wanted, at least not without problems
I may actually get this game now, I played the demo and actually enjoyed it quite a bit, but I wasn't sure what the final product would be like, looks like it's good.
just change the the name of this article to PS3 SUCK LOLZ FLAAAAMEE,
seriously, what's the point of posting this? \
Oh, and to Mart, how is 360 the REAL next-gen system? They are both as good. How is 360 better?
everyone's problem around here? It has been stated several times around here that both systems are about equal in power, one is better at certain things than the other. The ps3 ports look worse not because ps3 can't handle it, but rather that the developers aren't doing their job. And Who is stupid enough to say that 360 games can't run on ps3?
what a surprise 9_9 they delayed Heavenly sword to later than March, Oh well T_T not like I expected it to come by then anyway.
*Goes away and cries*
if when they show this BIG game, it turns out looking worse than they promised, which was essentially that it would look as good or better than the prerendered vid. I get the feeling it will be like with Motorstorm, where they said that while the graphics weren't as good as the target, they had reasons, and not very good ones. Basically they will probably say that while graphics aren't killer, that's because so much work went into something like AI, or level size, just as an excuse.
I'm just glad that they didn't do a LAZY port. It may just be a PORT, but at least it will give people a little more incentive to buy the system.
Don't you mean 300+ hours
they said INFLUENCED by, that doesn't mean they copied it, so what are you getting so upset about?